On-line CEUs

NAOT members with an active OTC credential can earn CEU credits toward recertification just by reading the “Tip of the Month” contained in each issue of the Orthotech Professional and answering a few short questions at the conclusion of the article.  Members can either answer the questions in the print version of the newsletter and return them via fax or mail to the NAOT offices, or submit answers on-line by clicking on the link at the end of each article and completing the on-line questionnaire. To receive 1 CEU (Category 2) for each article read, you must include:

-Your full name
-NAOT member number
-Email address (if applicable)
-Answers to all questions
-OTC number 

NAOT will maintain a database with these CEU submissions and provide a record of total CEUs earned at the end of each calendar year to all participating members.  Members will still be responsible for logging these hours with NBCOT at the appropriate time for recertification.


TIP OF THE MONTH: December 2009/January 2010
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroplasty

by Sean Conkle, OTC

Shoulder arthroplasty, most commonly known as shoulder replacement surgery, is a procedure in which a surgeon resurfaces damaged bone and cartilage at the ends of the bones in a patient’s affected shoulder joint. The procedure involves the use of metal alloy and polyethylene (plastic) implants designed to reduce or eliminate pain and restore motion in the shoulder by inhibiting painful bone-on-bone contact.

Shoulder Anatomy
The shoulder joint consists of the following:

Humerus
Glenoid
Acromion
Distal Clavicle

Components of Shoulder Replacement
Depending on the patient and procedure to be performed, the components of a shoulder replacement are:

Humeral Stem
Humeral Head
Glenoid
Glenoid Base Plate
Glenosphere



History
Shoulder arthroplasty has been around for over 100 years. The first shoulder replacement was performed in 1893 by a French surgeon, Dr. Jules-Émile-Péan, for a patient suffering from the effects of skeletal tuberculosis. This replacement was created with the assistance of a dental surgeon, and the prosthesis was composed of platinum and rubber. This first procedure was performed as a salvage procedure for pain relief only. Function was not a concern.


Mockup of first shoulder arthroplasty procedure

Throughout the early 20th century, shoulder replacements were performed primarily for proximal humeral fractures. These early procedures, however, had limited effectiveness in patients. Function was significantly limited and continued pain was common.

A major breakthrough in the procedure came when a Hemi-Arthroplasty procedure was performed. This procedure involved replacing the proximal humerus, which recreated the anatomy without violating the muscular attachments. The result was greatly improved patient outcomes, both in function and pain relief. Since this procedure kept the rotator cuff intact, it improved the patient’s daily activities. This new technique also limited the number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty to correct superior humeral migration and increased glenoid wear from instability.
In the early 1970’s, surgeons began performing Total Shoulder Arthorplasty on patients with significant degenerative changes of both the shoulder ball and socket. This procedure involved resurfacing the glenoid and humeral component. Early Total Shoulder Arthroplasty procedures often failed due to glenoid loosening, and surgeons returned to performing the hemi-Arthroplasty procedure.

By the late 1970’s, surgeons developed a new technique that addressed the limitations of earlier Total Shoulder Arthroplasty procedures. The new technique was called Constrained Total Shoulder Arthroplasy – known today as Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. This concept reverses the normal anatomy of the shoulder – placing the ball in the socket’s natural place, and the socket in the ball’s natural place. This constrained design was created to limit the stress placed on the glenoid, which was the cause of earlier Total Shoulder Arthroplasty failures. We now know that this constrained design is essential treatment in patients with rotator cuff deficient degenerative joint disease.


An x-ray image of a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

The newest development in shoulder replacement is the use of “Bony in Growth” technology. This new breakthrough allows the bones of the shoulder to grown into the components for fixation, which reduces the risk of bone cement interface failure and ultimately, component loosening.

Preoperative Planning for Shoulder Arthroplasty
When planning preoperatively for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, it is important to obtain an MRI of the shoulder to evaluate to status of the rotator cuff. A patient with a complete rupture of the supraspinatus tendon is not a good candidate for a Total Shoulder Arthroplasty because the prosthesis will have a tendency to migrate superiorly, causing articulation with the acromion. In this case, a CT scan should be performed to evaluate the glenoid. If a patient has a degenerative shoulder that is also rotator cuff deficient, posterior wear on the gleniod is often increased.

Shoulder arthroplasty has become a very common treatment in recent years. In the US alone, the number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures has grown from 15,400 in 2004 to approximately 23,000 in 2008. The US Department of Health estimates that by 2020, over 63,000 shoulder arthroplasty procedures will be performed annually, making the shoulder the third most commonly replaced joint in the body. With this growing demand, researchers and manufacturers are working to produce new and improved shoulder-replacement technology to capture this market and make the treatment even more effective.

CLICK HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE AND OBTAIN 1 CEU CREDIT


PAST ARTICLES

Articular Cartilage Leisons of the Knee (October 2009)
Understanding Patterns of Domestic Abuse (July 2009)
Knee Osteoarthritis (March 2009)
Peroneal Tendon Subluxation/Dislocation (January 2009)
Knee Microfracture Procedure (October 2008)
Dynamic Splinting (May/June 2008)
Osteomyelitis and the Orthopaedic Technologist: Stand Up for the Patient Who Can’t! (Nov/Dec 2007)
Total Contact Casting Technique (August/Sept 2007)
Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Presentation Using Metal on Metal Technology (June/July 2007)
Treating Displaced or Unstable Long Bone Fractures (Mar/Apr 2007)
The Berkhalter Immobilization for Metacarpal Fractures (Nov/Dec 2006)
Fiberglass Dust and its Potential as a Health Hazard During Cast Removal (Feb/Mar 2006)
The Origin, History and Use of the Intramedullary Nail (Dec/Jan 2006)
Patient and Technologist Safety in the Cast Room & Clinic (Sept/Oct 2005)
Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder (May/June 2005)
Index Ray Amputation (Feb/Mar 2005)
Tarsometatarsal Joint 1-5 Fracture Dislocation (Dec/Jan 2005)
Ulna Radius Fractures (Oct/Nov 2004)
The Protective Orthosis: FRC Technique Used in Protecting Finger External Fixator
(Aug/Sept 2004)

Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures: Case #2 (July 2004)
Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures: Case #1 (June 2004)


NAOT
8365 Keystone Crossing
Suite 107
Indianapolis, IN 46240
(317) 205-9484
(317) 205-9481 FAX
naot@hp-assoc.com
naot.org

Last Revised 1/14/10